Archive for January, 2010
Top 10 Web 2.0 for Educators – NICE Miniconference
Will be presenting in about 10 minutes at the NICE mini conference here in Illinois. Doing a revamped version of my Top 10 Web 2.0 for Educators. Most radical change is that I don’t have an aggregator in there. Still kinda torn about that. Part of it is that time is limited, but another piece is that I’m not positive that it’s as relevant as it used to be. Considering people are aggregating via their inbox, via iGoogle, via My Yahoo, within the browser and more. There’s so many ways to subscribe, that I’m not positive it’s worth including an aggregator in this type of fast paced presentation.
Regardless, the current version is embedded below, and the examples I show for each site can be found here.
Let me know what you think! What did I get right, and what did I miss? Above all, please be sure to include WHY. Oh yeah, you can also add your thoughts to this Wall.
Haiti 360

- Image via Wikipedia
With all the news about the disaster in Haiti, one of the more interesting things I’ve seen technologically recently came from there. I’ve seen 360 videos before, going all the way back to Quicktime VR and such. But this absolutely fascinates me.
This video was shot on January 18th, and while watching it, you are able to use your mouse to look in any direction, up or down as well. Pretty stunning to say the least. And what an incredible way to provide students a window into the area.
Can’t speak for you, but I’d love to see them run this through the Grand Canyon… or around Washington DC… or through an excavation site.
Vote for an ISTE Keynote

- Image by jochenWolters via Flickr
In case you haven’t been keeping up with ISTE‘s dive into the crowdsourcing arena, the final voting is now open for the ultimate keynote presentation at this year’s conference. Your choices are:
* Chris Lehmann
* Alan November
* Jeff Piontek
* Peter H. Reynolds
* Gary Stager
I know most of the people on the list, and they’re all worthy choices. You should definitely stop by and cast a vote for your favorite.
Unfortunately, that’s exactly what this has boiled down to. The process began with people proposing and voting on topics.
Then the topics were narrowed down to five, and people were able to suggest and vote for speakers on each of those topics.
Now the topics seem to have gone away completely, and we’re left with five names and we’re just supposed to pick one, on the topic of “Excellence in Education.” I guess the topic of “Good Things to Talk About” would have been too broad.
While I applaud ISTE in their efforts to engage the community and bring them into the process, I think it was handled poorly. Clearly, things have not been thought out quite enough.
It seems as thought phase 1 should have been skipped entirely. In round 2, there were 5 topics listed, and people nominated speakers for each topic. However, based on the sheer numbers in the voting, clearly not everybody realized that you could vote for people for each of the different topics. The speakers that were nominated in the first topic got the vast majority of the votes. Some very qualified people I think were victims of that confusion.
And the net result? When all is said and done, we have a popularity contest that’s being run on Polldaddy of all things. Really? No registration required to vote, just using a free polling widget that has already been well documented to be ‘hackable‘? I’m shocked that the largest EdTech conference in the country would step it up and not use a free, insecure polling widget to determine who will be their keynote presenter.
Moral of the story? Love the idea, hate the implementation. Hope they learn from this process.
Would you blog?

- Image by Josh Russell via Flickr
Like many other bloggers that I consider to be colleagues, my blogging has tapered off quite a bit over the years, and while some of the fault lies in myself, I put most of the blame squarely on Twitter. Why take half an hour to write several paragraphs, hyperlink it up and find an appropriate image, when I can just spout off 140 characters and move on? It just makes sense, right? That’s why I’m rather looking forward to Flutter’s official launch.
I jest, but it does bring out an obvious reason why blogging is becoming less and less of a ‘hot topic’ and Twitter keeps getting the buzz. It’s quick, it’s easy, it’s accessible, and most of all it doesn’t require a significant commitment. While it’s very arguable whether that’s a good thing or not, it’s a reality.
It used to be the standard, just an assumption that everybody would have a blog. Join a PLN, create a blog, set up your aggregator, be a part of the club. But now…. Well, I’m spending less and less time even using my aggregator. If it’s important enough to read, more than likely someone will tweet about it. And if they don’t… well, there’s a lot of good things to read that I miss. I can live with that. The library is full of them.
So the question then becomes, with dozens of microblog options out there (and even nanoblogs!), would you recommend a newbie start a blog? If somebody who is just getting started with community building and personal learning networks wanted an avenue to share, would you even suggest that they start a blog or set up an aggregator? Or do you shuffle them straight to Twitter/Plurk and roll from there? Or a different option altogether?
And don’t worry, I’m not missing the irony of posting this on a blog. I’ll be tweeting it out as well!
Related articles by Zemanta
- To blog or to tweet? (sunpig.com)
- 6 Things To Remember Before Posting A Tweet (johnchow.com)
- Good Grief! Enough Tweets? (charity-lynn.com)
- Is Blogging a dying art? And is Micro Blogging taking over? (web-workathome.com)
![Reblog this post [with Zemanta]](http://img.zemanta.com/reblog_e.png?x-id=c110c9e8-c4b2-4844-a8ee-95f0942def5b)
![Reblog this post [with Zemanta]](http://img.zemanta.com/reblog_e.png?x-id=7f46aba2-fae3-4a09-8ee1-2b89f3d1f621)

![Reblog this post [with Zemanta]](http://img.zemanta.com/reblog_e.png?x-id=a90fa0c2-6210-44bf-ac92-6dad270d76b5)
![Reblog this post [with Zemanta]](http://img.zemanta.com/reblog_e.png?x-id=a3cdc25f-eaed-47f9-b570-9f768dbf74b5)
![Reblog this post [with Zemanta]](http://img.zemanta.com/reblog_e.png?x-id=3be8642d-8714-4bd3-8635-e61db1a5c64a)