Your browser (Internet Explorer 6) is out of date. It has known security flaws and may not display all features of this and other websites. Learn how to update your browser.
X

Archive for January, 2010

Post

Top 10 Web 2.0 for Educators – NICE Miniconference

Will be presenting in about 10 minutes at the NICE mini conference here in Illinois. Doing a revamped version of my Top 10 Web 2.0 for Educators. Most radical change is that I don’t have an aggregator in there. Still kinda torn about that. Part of it is that time is limited, but another piece is that I’m not positive that it’s as relevant as it used to be. Considering people are aggregating via their inbox, via iGoogle, via My Yahoo, within the browser and more. There’s so many ways to subscribe, that I’m not positive it’s worth including an aggregator in this type of fast paced presentation.

Regardless, the current version is embedded below, and the examples I show for each site can be found here.

Let me know what you think! What did I get right, and what did I miss? Above all, please be sure to include WHY. Oh yeah, you can also add your thoughts to this Wall.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]
Post

Haiti 360

Google Street View Car in Southampton, Hampshi...
Image via Wikipedia

With all the news about the disaster in Haiti, one of the more interesting things I’ve seen technologically recently came from there. I’ve seen 360 videos before, going all the way back to Quicktime VR and such. But this absolutely fascinates me.

This video was shot on January 18th, and while watching it, you are able to use your mouse to look in any direction, up or down as well. Pretty stunning to say the least. And what an incredible way to provide students a window into the area.

Can’t speak for you, but I’d love to see them run this through the Grand Canyon… or around Washington DC… or through an excavation site.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]
Post

What could you do with Augmented Reality?

Augmented / Mixed Reality
Image by Eric Rice via Flickr

Augmented reality is one of the few technologies that have come out within the last few years that really have the ability to simply drop jaws. Primarily, it’s hung out in the marketing field, and been used in car ads and recently on the cover of Esquire magazine. Home versions include a DIY lightsasber and Addidas has announced plans to include an AR code into several of their upcoming shoes, allowing people to actually use the shoe as a controller for a video game. Seriously. I really couldn’t make that one up.

The big question of course is, does Augmented Reality have a place in education, and if so… what is it? At FETC, the folks over at SMART had a small corner of their booth devoted to Augmented Reality. The person there said flat out that they have nothing in production right now, they really have no idea where it’s going to go, they just think it’s neat, has potential and wanted to hear what educators thought.

Well, I got an email about a month ago from a company with a product called Imaginality, and they’re much farther along the path of figuring this stuff out than anybody else that I’ve seen yet. They’ve taken the ordinary webcam, combined it with images that you print out and created some pretty dynamic modules. Basically you download their software, choose which modules you want to purchase, and setup your webcam. Then, when you hold the ‘paddles’ in front of the camera, it displays various 3D objects. But that’s just the tip of the iceberg. What’s really interesting is the way the paddles can interact with each other. For example, check out this video of the Solar Explorer module.

As you can see, each paddle representes a different planet. The planets spin at the correct proportional speed, and have some bars in the corners representing various stats about them. But what’s interesting is when you move the planets within a few inches of each other. They resize themselves proportionally. The most dramatic example of that is when you move any planet next to the sun. Pretty powerful effect, much more so than holding up the pumpkin and a marble.

A few other examples. The video below is about the human heart. One paddle shows a beating heart, and by rotating it around you can see it from any angle. But the next four paddles display each of the four chambers. By holding up the ‘info’ paddle, you can make it translucent and see how blood flows through it. But when you start moving the paddles next to each other in the right combinations, the chambers actually connect to each other to create a complete heart.

Is this all you need to teach a student about the heart? Absolutely not. But you do have to admit that it’s a pretty amazing demonstration of the direction technology is moving. I mean, this isn’t something that you find in a museum, it’s being done with ordinary webcams and bar codes you print out. Pretty amazing.

The big question is, where does this belong in education? What kinds of AR should people be building? Science seems to be the most obvious application, and everything from biology to chemistry could make use of this. Think about the building blocks of matter, and how atoms interact with each other. But Imaginality also has a math module, using blocks to demonstrate how multiplication works. It’s more of a proof of concept right now, but it really does show some great potential.

I’d love to hear your thoughts about this one. Where does Augmented Reality fit in? If you could ask them to build a module, what would you want them to create? How would you use it in the classroom?

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]
Post

Vote for an ISTE Keynote

Proxy Vote for the 2009 EU Parliamentary Elections
Image by jochenWolters via Flickr

In case you haven’t been keeping up with ISTE‘s dive into the crowdsourcing arena, the final voting is now open for the ultimate keynote presentation at this year’s conference. Your choices are:
* Chris Lehmann
* Alan November
* Jeff Piontek
* Peter H. Reynolds
* Gary Stager

I know most of the people on the list, and they’re all worthy choices. You should definitely stop by and cast a vote for your favorite.

Unfortunately, that’s exactly what this has boiled down to. The process began with people proposing and voting on topics.

Then the topics were narrowed down to five, and people were able to suggest and vote for speakers on each of those topics.

Now the topics seem to have gone away completely, and we’re left with five names and we’re just supposed to pick one, on the topic of “Excellence in Education.” I guess the topic of “Good Things to Talk About” would have been too broad.

While I applaud ISTE in their efforts to engage the community and bring them into the process, I think it was handled poorly. Clearly, things have not been thought out quite enough.

It seems as thought phase 1 should have been skipped entirely. In round 2, there were 5 topics listed, and people nominated speakers for each topic. However, based on the sheer numbers in the voting, clearly not everybody realized that you could vote for people for each of the different topics. The speakers that were nominated in the first topic got the vast majority of the votes. Some very qualified people I think were victims of that confusion.

And the net result? When all is said and done, we have a popularity contest that’s being run on Polldaddy of all things. Really? No registration required to vote, just using a free polling widget that has already been well documented to be ‘hackable‘? I’m shocked that the largest EdTech conference in the country would step it up and not use a free, insecure polling widget to determine who will be their keynote presenter.

Moral of the story? Love the idea, hate the implementation. Hope they learn from this process.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]
Post

Would you blog?

Twitter Meta Moo! too far?
Image by Josh Russell via Flickr

Like many other bloggers that I consider to be colleagues, my blogging has tapered off quite a bit over the years, and while some of the fault lies in myself, I put most of the blame squarely on Twitter. Why take half an hour to write several paragraphs, hyperlink it up and find an appropriate image, when I can just spout off 140 characters and move on? It just makes sense, right? That’s why I’m rather looking forward to Flutter’s official launch.

I jest, but it does bring out an obvious reason why blogging is becoming less and less of a ‘hot topic’ and Twitter keeps getting the buzz. It’s quick, it’s easy, it’s accessible, and most of all it doesn’t require a significant commitment. While it’s very arguable whether that’s a good thing or not, it’s a reality.

It used to be the standard, just an assumption that everybody would have a blog. Join a PLN, create a blog, set up your aggregator, be a part of the club. But now…. Well, I’m spending less and less time even using my aggregator. If it’s important enough to read, more than likely someone will tweet about it. And if they don’t… well, there’s a lot of good things to read that I miss. I can live with that. The library is full of them.

So the question then becomes, with dozens of microblog options out there (and even nanoblogs!), would you recommend a newbie start a blog? If somebody who is just getting started with community building and personal learning networks wanted an avenue to share, would you even suggest that they start a blog or set up an aggregator? Or do you shuffle them straight to Twitter/Plurk and roll from there? Or a different option altogether?

And don’t worry, I’m not missing the irony of posting this on a blog. I’ll be tweeting it out as well!

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]