While doing some searching around for work, I came across a post on the BlogSafety Community forum by Larry Magid entitled Deleting ONline Predators or Deleting Online Teens.
It’s well worth the read. In a nutshell, Larry points out that while the act is intended to stop online predators, what it’s actually doing is stopping teens from accessing interactive websites in what is often the only supervised place they use the internet; their school.
If children are going to get into trouble online, chances are it won’t
be at school. They’ll be home, they’ll be at a friend’s house or they
could even be completely away from adult supervision using their mobile
phones. Schools and libraries are relatively protected environments
where adults are never far away and, for the most part, computers are in
public locations that make it difficult for users to hide what they’re
doing.
Larry makes some very powerful points about the value of social networking sites as a ‘potential safety valve’.
I spoke with John
Draper of the National Suicide Prevention Lifeline, who said that
at-risk kids are increasingly using their online profiles “to in some
ways convey they had suicidal intent.” Draper said that these sites have “the very real potential for saving
lives because the first people to hear about kids at risk are other
kids.” His organization is setting up profiles on MySpace, Xanga and
Facebook as a resource for teens.
The question is, what about this act actually protects online teens? It blocks one way that they can access to some sites that predators have used to meet teens. However, it doesn’t stop teens from accessing those sites, nor does it stop predators from using them. It’s lip service, through and through.
If anything, schools and libraries are the sole places that students SHOULD have access to those sites. Locations where they will have supervision, guidance, and support in their explorations. Larry sums it up pretty well in his conclusion:
I’m glad Congress is concerned with Internet safety but rather than pass
DOPA, it ought to be funding campaigns to educate children, parents, and
teachers on how to use the Internet safely - while giving the cops and
prosecutors the resources they need to truly delete online predators.
Can I get an amen?
technorati tags:dopa, education, blogging, safety, internet
Blogged with Flock
AMEN. Thank you for a terrific post, much along what I’ve been thinking lately–well done.
I couldn’t agree more. It’s essential for students to learn how to be safe even as they use social software on the Internet. We should take it for granted that they are going to use the Internet. Now we need to decide if we want them to have the skills to use it wisely. Prohibiting students from using social software at school would have been a lot like prohbiting them from going on field trips in days gone by. Because once you leave the school and go out onto the streets dangerous things can happen. Yes, this is true. But to forbid field trips would have been absurd. Smart adults should want students to develop “Internet smarts” which nicely compliment “street smarts.”
Andrew Pass
http://www.Pass-Ed.com/blogger.html
Amen!! Teaching students to be safe on the Internet, I feel, should be part of the curriculum. Starting in Kindergarten, students should be learning Internet Safety and it should continue well into high school. If you think about it, nobody has really taught today’s teenagers Internet Safety. Most everything they have learned and are engaging in has been all on their own. They’re growing up in the Digital Age where their parents and teachers did not. It would be great to see this part of the curriculum. iSafe America http://www.isafe.org/ is a great place to start. It has free PD and free K-12 curriculum once you complete the PD. Thanks for the post =)
Comments RSS TrackBack Identifier URI
Leave a comment









Flickr/teach42
Myspace/teach42
Facebook/Steve Dembo
Linkedin/teach42
Twitter/teach42
YouTube/teach42
Del.icio.us/teach42
GMail/Steve Dembo
Technorati/teach42
MyBlogLog/teach42



3 Comments