What happened in Tibet in 1950 was 56 years ago.

However, on the chinese wikipedia, before 11-23, 2006, there was nothing about how china took over tibet in 1950. it was written as “in 1950, the pr china government signed “peaceful liberation treaty” with the tibetan government, under the condition of respecting Tibetan’s system and life style, the liberation army was allowed to enter tibet.” That was all they have on that part of the history.

So on 11-23, 2006, I added that part of the history according to I read from the Dalai lama’s exile government web site. [76]. my article and the links were immediately deleted by the chinese moderator Louer. I tried to add those once again on 12-6-2006, it was also immediately deleted by another Chinese moderator Jasonzhoucn. only on 12-11-2006, 56 years after what happened in Tibet, did the moderator Ran reverted my part of contribution. Before that day, those two moderators Louer and Jasonzhoucn accused my part of contribution as “vandalism,” as they often call the contributions that i wrote on the Chinese site. very typical of them.

However, as for today, 12-30-2006, the link where I got my reference from is still not included in the article. This is just another good example to show you that how biased the Chinese site is, whethey they work for the Chinese communist government, you will be the judge for yourself. I am only listening the information here.

Chinese Wikipedia, PR China did not have the word Falun Gong until 12-29-2006 when this moderator Ran added, when I tried to add it more than a month, it was deleted immediately. Even as for now, the phrase “Human rights” is only mentioned ONCE in that entire article under the name of “Organization for Human rights”. That is it. yes, you read it right. “Human Rights” only appeared once in that entire article. when I tried to added more information about human rights in the article on 11-22-2006, it was immediatly deleted by the moderator Mongol. Then I was banned from editing and that article was put under protection. Even today, there is still not a direct link to Human rights in the People’s Republic of China on the Chinese site, either. while on the English site People’s Republic of China, there is an entire paragraph about it, and a direct link to Human rights in the People’s Republic of China. now is that site biased or not. you will be the judge yourself.